Hoek HW. Review of the worldwide epidemiology of eating disorders. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2016;29:336–9.
Google Scholar
Tavolacci MP, Ladner J, Déchelotte P. Sharp Increase in Eating Disorders among University Students since the COVID-19 Pandemic. Nutrients. 2021;13:3415.
Corsica JA, Hood MM. Eating disorders in an obesogenic environment. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111:996–1000.
Google Scholar
King BM. The modern obesity epidemic, ancestral hunter-gatherers, and the sensory/reward control of food intake. Am Psychol. 2013;68:88–96.
Google Scholar
Cleobury L, Tapper K. Reasons for eating ‘unhealthy’ snacks in overweight and obese males and females. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2014;27:333–41.
Google Scholar
Bes-Rastrollo M, Sanchez-Villegas A, Basterra-Gortari FJ, Nunez-Cordoba JM, Toledo E, Serrano-Martinez M. Prospective study of self-reported usual snacking and weight gain in a Mediterranean cohort: the SUN project. Clin Nutr. 2010;29:323–30.
Google Scholar
Johnson F, Wardle J. Variety, palatability, and obesity. Adv Nutr. 2014;5:851–9.
Google Scholar
Cope EC, Gould E. New evidence linking obesity and food addiction. Biol Psychiatry. 2017;81:734–6.
Google Scholar
Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Baler RD. Reward, dopamine and the control of food intake: implications for obesity. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011;15:37–46.
Google Scholar
Frank GKW, Shott ME, DeGuzman MC. The neurobiology of eating disorders. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2019;28:629–40.
Google Scholar
Leigh SJ, Morris MJ. The role of reward circuitry and food addiction in the obesity epidemic: An update. Biol Psychol. 2018;131:31–42.
Google Scholar
Zheng H, Berthoud HR. Neural systems controlling the drive to eat: mind versus metabolism. Physiology (Bethesda). 2008;23:75–83.
Google Scholar
Berridge KC, Robinson TE. What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1998;28:309–69.
Google Scholar
Berridge KC, Robinson TE. Parsing reward. Trends Neurosci. 2003;26:507–13.
Google Scholar
Mela DJ. Eating for pleasure or just wanting to eat? Reconsidering sensory hedonic responses as a driver of obesity. Appetite. 2006;47:10–7.
Google Scholar
Berthoud HR, Morrison C. The brain, appetite, and obesity. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:55–92.
Google Scholar
Finlayson G, King N, Blundell JE. Liking vs. wanting food: importance for human appetite control and weight regulation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2007;31:987–1002.
Google Scholar
Berridge KC. ‘Liking’ and ‘wanting’ food rewards: brain substrates and roles in eating disorders. Physiol Behav. 2009;97:537–50.
Google Scholar
Berridge KC. Food reward: brain substrates of wanting and liking. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1996;20:1–25.
Google Scholar
Finlayson G, Dalton M. Current progress in the assessment of ‘liking’ vs. ‘wanting’ food in human appetite. Comment on ‘“You Say it’s Liking, I Say it’s Wanting… “. On the difficulty of disentangling food reward in man’. Appetite. 2012;58:373–8.
Google Scholar
Benton D. The plausibility of sugar addiction and its role in obesity and eating disorders. Clin Nutr. 2010;29:288–303.
Google Scholar
Hyman SE, Malenka RC. Addiction and the brain: the neurobiology of compulsion and its persistence. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2:695–703.
Google Scholar
Koob GF, Le Moal M. Drug addiction, dysregulation of reward, and allostasis. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001;24:97–129.
Google Scholar
Kelley AE, Berridge KC. The neuroscience of natural rewards: Relevance to addictive drugs. J Neurosci. 2002;22:3306–11.
Google Scholar
Robinson TE, Berridge KC. Addiction. Ann Rev Psychol. 2003;54:25–53.
Google Scholar
Soares-Cunha C, Coimbra B, Sousa N, Rodrigues AJ. Reappraising striatal D1- and D2-neurons in reward and aversion. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;68:370–86.
Google Scholar
Surmeier DJ, Song WJ, Yan Z. Coordinated expression of dopamine receptors in neostriatal medium spiny neurons. J Neurosci. 1996;16:6579–91.
Google Scholar
Lobo MK, Covington HE 3rd, Chaudhury D, Friedman AK, Sun H, Damez-Werno D, et al. Cell type-specific loss of BDNF signaling mimics optogenetic control of cocaine reward. Science. 2010;330:385–90.
Google Scholar
Kupchik YM, Brown RM, Heinsbroek JA, Lobo MK, Schwartz DJ, Kalivas PW. Coding the direct/indirect pathways by D1 and D2 receptors is not valid for accumbens projections. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18:1230–2.
Google Scholar
Trifilieff P, Feng B, Urizar E, Winiger V, Ward RD, Taylor KM, et al. Increasing dopamine D2 receptor expression in the adult nucleus accumbens enhances motivation. Mol Psychiatr. 2013;18:1025–33.
Google Scholar
Yang H, de Jong JW, Tak Y, Peck J, Bateup HS, Lammel S. Nucleus Accumbens Subnuclei Regulate Motivated Behavior via Direct Inhibition and Disinhibition of VTA Dopamine Subpopulations. Neuron. 2018;97:434–49.e4.
Google Scholar
Soares-Cunha C, Coimbra B, David-Pereira A, Borges S, Pinto L, Costa P, et al. Activation of D2 dopamine receptor-expressing neurons in the nucleus accumbens increases motivation. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11829.
Google Scholar
Soares-Cunha C, de Vasconcelos NAP, Coimbra B, Domingues AV, Silva JM, Loureiro-Campos E, et al. Nucleus accumbens medium spiny neurons subtypes signal both reward and aversion. Mol Psychiatry. 2020;25:3241–55.
Google Scholar
Natsubori A, Tsutsui-Kimura I, Nishida H, Bouchekioua Y, Sekiya H, Uchigashima M, et al. Ventrolateral striatal medium spiny neurons positively regulate food-incentive, goal-directed behavior independently of D1 and D2 selectivity. J Neurosci. 2017;37:2723.
Google Scholar
O’Connor EC, Kremer Y, Lefort S, Harada M, Pascoli V, Rohner C, et al. Accumbal D1R neurons projecting to lateral hypothalamus authorize feeding. Neuron. 2015;88:553–64.
Google Scholar
Zhu X, Ottenheimer D, DiLeone RJ. Activity of D1/2 receptor expressing neurons in the nucleus accumbens regulates running, locomotion, and food intake. Front Behav Neurosci. 2016;10:66.
Google Scholar
Wu H, Kakusa B, Neuner S, Christoffel DJ, Heifets BD, Malenka RC, et al. Local accumbens in vivo imaging during deep brain stimulation reveals a strategy-dependent amelioration of hedonic feeding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2022;119:e2109269118.
Gerfen CR, Paletzki R, Heintz N. GENSAT BAC cre-recombinase driver lines to study the functional organization of cerebral cortical and basal ganglia circuits. Neuron. 2013;80:1368–83.
Google Scholar
Legaria AA, Matikainen-Ankney BA, Yang B, Ahanonu B, Licholai JA, Parker JG, et al. Fiber photometry in striatum reflects primarily nonsomatic changes in calcium. Nat Neurosci. 2022;25:1124–8.
Google Scholar
Davis JD, Smith GP. Analysis of the microstructure of the rhythmic tongue movements of rats ingesting maltose and sucrose solutions. Behav Neurosci. 1992;106:217–28.
Google Scholar
Davis JD. The microstructure of ingestive behavior. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1989;575:106–19.
Google Scholar
Dwyer DM, Lydall ES, Hayward AJ. Simultaneous contrast: evidence from licking microstructure and cross-solution comparisons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2011;37:200–10.
Google Scholar
Galistu A, D’Aquila PS. Dopamine on D2-like receptors “reboosts” dopamine D1-like receptor-mediated behavioural activation in rats licking for a isotonic NaCl solution. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2013;229:357–66.
Google Scholar
Robinson SL, McCool BA. Microstructural analysis of rat ethanol and water drinking patterns using a modified operant self-administration model. Physiol Behav. 2015;149:119–30.
Google Scholar
Johnson AW. Characterizing ingestive behavior through licking microstructure: Underlying neurobiology and its use in the study of obesity in animal models. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2018;64:38–47.
Google Scholar
Mendez IA, Maidment NT, Murphy NP. Parsing the hedonic and motivational influences of nociceptin on feeding using licking microstructure analysis in mice. Behav Pharmacol. 2016;27:516–27.
Google Scholar
Ostlund SB, Kosheleff A, Maidment NT, Murphy NP. Decreased consumption of sweet fluids in mu opioid receptor knockout mice: a microstructural analysis of licking behavior. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2013;229:105–13.
Google Scholar
D’Aquila PS. Dopamine on D2-like receptors “reboosts” dopamine D1-like receptor-mediated behavioural activation in rats licking for sucrose. Neuropharmacology. 2010;58:1085–96.
Google Scholar
Davis JD. The effectiveness of some sugars in stimulating licking behavior in the rat. Physiol Behav. 1973;11:39–45.
Google Scholar
Smith GP. John Davis and the meanings of licking. Appetite. 2001;36:84–92.
Google Scholar
Dwyer DM. Licking and liking: The assessment of hedonic responses in rodents. Q J Exp Psychol. 2012;65:371–94.
Google Scholar
Higgs S, Cooper SJ. Effects of benzodiazepine receptor ligands on the ingestion of sucrose, intralipid, and maltodextrin: An investigation using a microstructural analysis of licking behavior in a brief contact test. Behav Neurosci. 1998;112:447–57.
Google Scholar
Spector AC, Klumpp PA, Kaplan JM. Analytical issues in the evaluation of food deprivation and sucrose concentration effects on the microstructure of licking behavior in the rat. Behav Neurosci. 1998;112:678–94.
Google Scholar
Kravitz AV, Tye LD, Kreitzer AC. Distinct roles for direct and indirect pathway striatal neurons in reinforcement. Nat Neurosci. 2012;15:816–8.
Google Scholar
Sclafani A, Ackroff K. The relationship between food reward and satiation revisited. Physiol Behav. 2004;82:89–95.
Google Scholar
Johnson AW. Examining the influence of CS duration and US density on cue-potentiated feeding through analyses of licking microstructure. Learn Motiv. 2018;61:85–96.
Google Scholar
Kelley AE, Baldo BA, Pratt WE, Will MJ. Corticostriatal-hypothalamic circuitry and food motivation: integration of energy, action and reward. Physiol Behav. 2005;86:773–95.
Google Scholar
Roitman MF, Wheeler RA, Carelli RM. Nucleus accumbens neurons are innately tuned for rewarding and aversive taste stimuli, encode their predictors, and are linked to motor output. Neuron. 2005;45:587–97.
Google Scholar
Villavicencio M, Moreno MG, Simon SA, Gutierrez R. Encoding of Sucrose’s Palatability in the Nucleus Accumbens Shell and Its Modulation by Exteroceptive Auditory Cues. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:265.
Berridge KC, Valenstein ES. What psychological process mediates feeding evoked by electrical stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus? Behav Neurosci. 1991;105:3–14.
Google Scholar
Pecina S, Cagniard B, Berridge KC, Aldridge JW, Zhuang X. Hyperdopaminergic mutant mice have higher “wanting” but not “liking” for sweet rewards. J Neurosci. 2003;23:9395–402.
Google Scholar
Wyvell CL, Berridge KC. Intra-accumbens amphetamine increases the conditioned incentive salience of sucrose reward: enhancement of reward “wanting” without enhanced “liking” or response reinforcement. J Neurosci. 2000;20:8122–30.
Google Scholar
Smith KS, Berridge KC. The ventral pallidum and hedonic reward: neurochemical maps of sucrose “liking” and food intake. J Neurosci. 2005;25:8637–49.
Google Scholar
Avena N, Bocarsly M, Lee C, Grossberg A, Hackell R, Schwenker J, et al. Behavioral indices of anxiety during sucrose abstinence in rats. Obes Res. 2005;13:A111–A.
Taha SA, Fields HL. Inhibitions of nucleus accumbens neurons encode a gating signal for reward-directed behavior. J Neurosci. 2006;26:217.
Google Scholar
Taha SA, Fields HL. Encoding of palatability and appetitive behaviors by distinct neuronal populations in the nucleus accumbens. J Neurosci. 2005;25:1193–202.
Google Scholar
Krause M, German PW, Taha SA, Fields HL. A pause in nucleus accumbens neuron firing is required to initiate and maintain feeding. J Neurosci. 2010;30:4746.
Google Scholar
Carlezon WA Jr., Thomas MJ. Biological substrates of reward and aversion: a nucleus accumbens activity hypothesis. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:122–32.
Google Scholar
Chen Z, Zhang ZY, Zhang W, Xie T, Li Y, Xu XH, et al. Direct and indirect pathway neurons in ventrolateral striatum differentially regulate licking movement and nigral responses. Cell Rep. 2021;37:109847.
Google Scholar
Beninger RJ. The role of dopamine in locomotor activity and learning. Brain Res. 1983;287:173–96.
Google Scholar
Schultz W. Predictive reward signal of dopamine neurons. J Neurophysiol. 1998;80:1–27.
Google Scholar
Self DW. Diminished role for dopamine D1 receptors in cocaine addiction? Biol Psychiatry. 2014;76:2–3.
Google Scholar
Calipari ES, Bagot RC, Purushothaman I, Davidson TJ, Yorgason JT, Pena CJ, et al. In vivo imaging identifies temporal signature of D1 and D2 medium spiny neurons in cocaine reward. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:2726–31.
Google Scholar
Cole SL, Robinson MJF, Berridge KC. Optogenetic self-stimulation in the nucleus accumbens: D1 reward versus D2 ambivalence. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0207694.
Google Scholar
Schultz W. Dopamine neurons and their role in reward mechanisms. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1997;7:191–7.
Google Scholar
Wise RA, Rompre PP. Brain dopamine and reward. Annu Rev Psychol. 1989;40:191–225.
Google Scholar
Graham DL, Hoppenot R, Hendryx A, Self DW. Differential ability of D1 and D2 dopamine receptor agonists to induce and modulate expression and reinstatement of cocaine place preference in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007;191:719–30.
Google Scholar
Ranaldi R, Beninger RJ. Bromocriptine enhancement of responding for conditioned reward depends on intact D1 receptor function. Psychopharmacology. 1995;118:437–43.
Google Scholar
Sutton MA, Beninger RJ. Psychopharmacology of conditioned reward: evidence for a rewarding signal at D1-like dopamine receptors. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999;144:95–110.
Google Scholar
Fibiger H. Mesolimbic dopamine: An analysis of its role in motivated behavior. Sem Neurosci. 1993;5:321–7.
Google Scholar
McDougall SA, Nonneman AJ, Crawford CA. Effects of SCH 23390 and sulpiride on the reinforced responding of the young rat. Behav Neurosci. 1991;105:744–54.
Google Scholar
Cousins MS, Wei W, Salamone JD. Pharmacological characterization of performance on a concurrent lever pressing/feeding choice procedure: effects of dopamine antagonist, cholinomimetic, sedative and stimulant drugs. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1994;116:529–37.
Google Scholar
Aberman JE, Ward SJ, Salamone JD. Effects of dopamine antagonists and accumbens dopamine depletions on time-constrained progressive-ratio performance. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1998;61:341–8.
Google Scholar
Koch M, Schmid A, Schnitzler H-U. Role of nucleus accumbens dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in instrumental and Pavlovian paradigms of conditioned reward. Psychopharmacology. 2000;152:67–73.
Google Scholar
Beninger RJ, Cheng M, Hahn BL, Hoffman DC, Mazurski EJ, Morency MA, et al. Effects of extinction, pimozide, SCH 23390, and metoclopramide on food-rewarded operant responding of rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1987;92:343–9.
Google Scholar
Koo JW, Lobo MK, Chaudhury D, Labonté B, Friedman A, Heller E, et al. Loss of BDNF signaling in D1R-expressing NAc neurons enhances morphine reward by reducing GABA inhibition. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014;39:2646–53.
Google Scholar
Schmidt HD, Anderson SM, Pierce RC. Stimulation of D1-like or D2 dopamine receptors in the shell, but not the core, of the nucleus accumbens reinstates cocaine-seeking behaviour in the rat. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;23:219–28.
Google Scholar
Wakabayashi KT, Fields HL, Nicola SM. Dissociation of the role of nucleus accumbens dopamine in responding to reward-predictive cues and waiting for reward. Behav Brain Res. 2004;154:19–30.
Google Scholar
Soares-Cunha C, Coimbra B, Domingues AV, Vasconcelos N, Sousa N, Rodrigues AJ. Nucleus Accumbens Microcircuit Underlying D2-MSN-Driven Increase in Motivation. eNeuro. 2018;5:ENEURO.0386-18.2018.
Kurikawa T, Haga T, Handa T, Harukuni R, Fukai T. Neuronal stability in medial frontal cortex sets individual variability in decision-making. Nat Neurosci. 2018;21:1764–73.
Google Scholar
Yin HH, Ostlund SB, Balleine BW. Reward-guided learning beyond dopamine in the nucleus accumbens: the integrative functions of cortico-basal ganglia networks. Eur J Neurosci. 2008;28:1437–48.
Google Scholar
de Jong JW, Afjei SA, Pollak Dorocic I, Peck JR, Liu C, Kim CK, et al. A neural circuit mechanism for encoding aversive stimuli in the mesolimbic dopamine system. Neuron. 2019;101:133–51.e7.
Google Scholar
Nicola SM, Yun IA, Wakabayashi KT, Fields HL. Cue-evoked firing of nucleus accumbens neurons encodes motivational significance during a discriminative stimulus task. J Neurophysiol. 2004;91:1840–65.
Google Scholar
Liu Z, Le Q, Lv Y, Chen X, Cui J, Zhou Y, et al. A distinct D1-MSN subpopulation down-regulates dopamine to promote negative emotional state. Cell Res. 2022;32:139–56.
Google Scholar
Kruyer A, Parrilla-Carrero J, Powell C, Brandt L, Gutwinski S, Angelis A, et al. Accumbens D2-MSN hyperactivity drives antipsychotic-induced behavioral supersensitivity. Mol Psychiatry. 2021;26:6159–69.
Google Scholar
Sackett DA, Moschak TM, Carelli RM. Nucleus accumbens shell dopamine mediates outcome value, but not predicted value, in a magnitude decision-making task. Eur J Neurosci. 2020;51:1526–38.
Google Scholar
Day JJ, Roitman MF, Wightman RM, Carelli RM. Associative learning mediates dynamic shifts in dopamine signaling in the nucleus accumbens. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:1020–8.
Google Scholar
Saddoris MP, Sugam JA, Cacciapaglia F, Carelli RM. Rapid dopamine dynamics in the accumbens core and shell: learning and action. Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2013;5:273–88.
Google Scholar
Beyene M, Carelli RM, Wightman RM. Cue-evoked dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens shell tracks reinforcer magnitude during intracranial self-stimulation. Neuroscience. 2010;169:1682–8.
Google Scholar
Sackett DA, Saddoris MP, Carelli RM. Nucleus Accumbens Shell Dopamine Preferentially Tracks Information Related to Outcome Value of Reward. eNeuro. 2017;4:ENEURO.0058-17.2017.
Lowe MR, Butryn ML. Hedonic hunger: a new dimension of appetite? Physiol Behav. 2007;91:432–9.
Google Scholar
Lutter M, Nestler EJ. Homeostatic and hedonic signals interact in the regulation of food intake. J Nutr. 2009;139:629–32.
Google Scholar
Matikainen-Ankney BA, Legaria AA, Pan Y, Vachez YM, Murphy CA, Schaefer RF, et al. Nucleus Accumbens D(1) Receptor-Expressing Spiny Projection Neurons Control Food Motivation and Obesity. Biol Psychiatry. 2023;93:512–23.
Schulte EM, Smeal JK, Gearhardt AN. Foods are differentially associated with subjective effect report questions of abuse liability. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0184220.
Google Scholar
Stice E, Yokum S. Neural vulnerability factors that increase risk for future weight gain. Psychol Bull. 2016;142:447–71.
Google Scholar
Devoto F, Zapparoli L, Bonandrini R, Berlingeri M, Ferrulli A, Luzi L, et al. Hungry brains: A meta-analytical review of brain activation imaging studies on food perception and appetite in obese individuals. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018;94:271–85.
Google Scholar
Berthoud HR, Lenard NR, Shin AC. Food reward, hyperphagia, and obesity. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2011;300:R1266–77.
Google Scholar
Gearhardt AN, Boswell RG, White MA. The association of “food addiction” with disordered eating and body mass index. Eat Behav. 2014;15:427–33.
Google Scholar
Robinson TE, Berridge KC. The neural basis of drug craving – an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Rev. 1993;18:247–91.
Google Scholar
Frankort A, Roefs A, Siep N, Roebroeck A, Havermans R, Jansen A. Reward activity in satiated overweight women is decreased during unbiased viewing but increased when imagining taste: An event-related fMRI study. Int J Obes. 2011;36:627–37.
Google Scholar
Stoeckel LE, Weller RE, Cook EW 3rd, Twieg DB, Knowlton RC, Cox JE. Widespread reward-system activation in obese women in response to pictures of high-calorie foods. Neuroimage. 2008;41:636–47.
Google Scholar
Rothemund Y, Preuschhof C, Bohner G, Bauknecht HC, Klingebiel R, Flor H, et al. Differential activation of the dorsal striatum by high-calorie visual food stimuli in obese individuals. Neuroimage. 2007;37:410–21.
Google Scholar
Simon JJ, Skunde M, Walther S, Bendszus M, Herzog W, Friederich HC. Neural signature of food reward processing in bulimic-type eating disorders. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016;11:1393–401.
Google Scholar
Wolz I, Sauvaget A, Granero R, Mestre-Bach G, Baño M, Martín-Romera V, et al. Subjective craving and event-related brain response to olfactory and visual chocolate cues in binge-eating and healthy individuals. Sci Rep. 2017;7:41736.
Google Scholar
Polk SE, Schulte EM, Furman CR, Gearhardt AN. Wanting and liking: Separable components in problematic eating behavior? Appetite. 2017;115:45–53.
Google Scholar
Volkow ND, Wise RA, Baler R. The dopamine motive system: implications for drug and food addiction. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017;18:741–52.
Google Scholar
Fletcher PC, Kenny PJ. Food addiction: a valid concept? Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018;43:2506–13.
Google Scholar
Westwater ML, Fletcher PC, Ziauddeen H. Sugar addiction: the state of the science. Eur J Nutr. 2016;55:55–69.
Google Scholar
Cameron JD, Chaput JP, Sjödin AM, Goldfield GS. Brain on fire: incentive salience, hedonic hot spots, dopamine, obesity, and other hunger games. Annu Rev Nutr. 2017;37:183–205.
Google Scholar
Carter A, Hendrikse J, Lee N, Yücel M, Verdejo-Garcia A, Andrews ZB, et al. The neurobiology of “food addiction” and its implications for obesity treatment and policy. Annual Rev Nutr. 2016;36:105–28.
Google Scholar
Urai AE, Aguillon-Rodriguez V, Laranjeira IC, Cazettes F, Mainen ZF, Churchland AK. Citric Acid Water as an Alternative to Water Restriction for High-Yield Mouse Behavior. eNeuro. 2021;8:ENEURO.0230-20.2020.
Owen SF, Liu MH, Kreitzer AC. Thermal constraints on in vivo optogenetic manipulations. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22:1061–5.
Google Scholar
Field A Chapter 7: Regression. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. 2009. Third ed: SAGE Publications Ltd. p. 197-263.
Myers R. Classical and modern regression with applications. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Duxbury; 1990.
Bowerman BL, O’Connell RT. Linear statistical models: An applied approach. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Duxbury; 1990.
Mathis MW, Mathis A, Uchida N. Somatosensory cortex plays an essential role in forelimb motor adaptation in mice. Neuron. 2017;93:1493–503.e6.
Google Scholar
Hogue O, Harvey T, Crozier D, Sonneborn C, Postle A, Block-Beach H, et al. Statistical practice and transparent reporting in the neurosciences: Preclinical motor behavioral experiments. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0265154.
Google Scholar
Recommendations for the design and analysis of in vivo electrophysiology studies. J Neurosci. 2018;38:5837-9.
